I was browsing NPR's website today after listening to Morning Edition when I came across an older article that caught my eye. It caught my eye with the first word of the title, "Paris". I spent five weeks in Paris this summer taking art history classes, and I take advantage of every opportunity that allows me to reminisce. It wasn't until after I enthusiastically clicked on the article that I read the rest of the title - "Paris Has Been a Haven For African Americans Escaping Racism."
Eleanor Beardsley, the author of this article, emphasizes how Paris has been an escape for African Americans for longer than most of us are aware of. Although there was a mass migration to Paris from the United States during the time of the Harlem Renaissance, the first mass migration was following the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. Since then, Paris has been a steady save haven for African Americans. She touches upon what we have talked so much about in class, the fact that black soldiers were fighting in the world war for freedom and democracy, two elements of life that they had not experienced in America. Dissatisfied with the living conditions at home, many African American soldiers stayed in Paris or simply returned to Paris after the war.
Not only was Paris a refuge from racism, but it was a city where black musicians, writers, and artists were celebrated. Coming from America, where their talents were not recognized but mocked in forms such as Minstrel shows, Paris had an outlet from African American artists to advance society. When France discovered African American music, their jazz age was taken to the next level. Clubs would fight over African American jazz bands for their weekend shows. Beardsley references a woman by the name of Josephine Baker, the daughter of a housemaid in St. Louis. Taking her musical gifts very seriously, she knew that she had to move outside of the U.S. to pursue her life as a musician. She moved to Paris in 1925, becoming a star attraction in the nightclub scene. She was also awarded the French Legion of Honor medal for fighting in the Resistance. Life was starkly different for Josephine than it was for any black woman in America who had musical talent or a desire to be a part of war resistance.
Beardsley also interviewed an African American professor, James Emanuel, who moved to Paris from North Carolina in the 1960's. He is a well-known writer in France and his students from North Carolina claim that he has not received the recognition that he should have in America. Beardsley questioned whether or not he should have stayed in the United States despite racism, and she received a very honest answer:
"No way. No, no. Again, it's the tragedy that I never can talk about. It was too evil, too vicious. And any country that would tolerate it is a country I can't put my foot in... At last, if America ever solves its racial problem, it will be the greatest country in the world."
To compare the living conditions of African Americans in the United States and Paris during the 20th century is to further reveal the harm done within our nation. This is not a racism that America fed into and succumbed to along with the rest of the world. It is a racism that America created and perpetuated.
Do you have any reactions to the comparison of living conditions between the American South and somewhere like Paris, France?
Friday, October 25, 2013
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Incredible Vimeo video
This fifteen minute video was shot in South Memphis. It captures the life of man named Chris Dean who's lived in the area for most of his life. When he was two, he had what seems to have been open heart surgery when he died and came back to life. The cameramen in this video roamed the streets of Memphis for eight weeks to get a glimpse of the poverty-stricken areas of the city. It's an incredible video.
http://vimeo.com/48312847
http://vimeo.com/48312847
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Slave Breeding
An article
on an upcoming Crosstown Arts event recently caught my attention. While
Southern author Margaret Winkle visiting Memphis to discuss her debut novel Wash seemed intriguing, it was the
novel’s central theme that I immediately wanted to learn more about—slave
breeding and owning a slave (or slaves) solely for that purpose. This controversial
subject was briefly mentioned in Johnson’s Soul
by Soul as he tended to discuss more about the slave market itself than
slaveholders breeding male and female slaves to reproduce slave children. This
book about an American Revolution veteran who starts breeding his slave Wash to
save his Tennessee plantation from financial ruin isn’t the only controversial
matter however—one book review statement saying, “the basic notion of a white
Southern woman from a privileged background taking on the voice of an
antebellum male slave put out to stud” is as well (Tarkington). The author
explains that her reasons for writing a book like this grew from the desire to
investigate the slave breeding relationship in the early nineteenth century
after hearing reports that her own ancestors may have bred slaves.
The fact
that slaves were reproduced on purpose to increase the assets and wealth of the
slave masters baffles me. To a certain extent, I understand that slave owners
raped their slaves and forced them to do unthinkable things. But whatever their
inexcusable reason why, I never thought in terms of a potential pregnancy as
the sole purpose. As slave breeding is studied further though, whether it be
through scholarly research or a fictitious novel, more theories emerge about
the mind of the white master, as can be seen in Johnson’s Soul by Soul. In spending free time in the future, I look forward
to reading Wrinkle’s book and seeing how she portrays one of the worst degrees
of chattel slavery. But until then, I encourage anyone who’s free to check out
the Wash reading by local actress Jazmin Miller and following discussion moderated by University
of Memphis director of African and African American Studies Ladrica Menson-Furr
at 430 North Cleveland Street on October 15th from 6:00pm to 8:00pm.
Friday, October 11, 2013
Hometown Reflections
Since the beginning of this class, I’ve begun to think more
and more about the similarities between the first eighteen years of my life and
those of another girl raised in a rural setting, say, about a century ago. I
know that race relations have changed tremendously, thankfully, but I’m
beginning to wonder about why certain things haven’t seemed to change
significantly in my hometown. I’m from a very small village in South Louisiana,
where I see the Swamp People at the grocery store and complain about the slow
traffic caused by all the John Deere’s on the road, especially this time of
year. Unlike most of my high school classmates however, I grew up on a
sugarcane plantation. My dad is a farmer, and his dad farmed the same land
before. It’s a small operation, a little less than 700 acres, and I love to
describe how my family lives alone in the middle of the fields and have the
freedom to take the 4-wheelers out whenever or go crawfishin’ in the back. But
we don’t actually live alone: two full-time employees of Adolph Farms, Inc.
live right down the street. To some in our community, they’re the “field
hands”; to me, they’ve always been “Dad’s workers.” Ford and Joe, two older
African American men, worked for my grandfather and now my dad, but I couldn’t
tell you a thing about them. I also couldn’t tell you about Willa Mae, who I
remember living in a house up the road until I was about twelve. She moved into
town then. All I know is that she used to babysit my dad and his siblings, and
she must be in her eighties now. And Ford and Joe—I couldn’t tell you what the
inside of their houses look like, what they like to eat or do, or who their
grandchildren are. I couldn’t tell you Willa Mae’s last name, or Ford’s first
name. I know nothing about them.
It may
sound like I still live in an area that could easily be taken straight out of
the late nineteenth century, and in some cases, I think I do. But as I learn
more in this class about the “Mabel” figure or attempts to create human space
by African Americans, I try to prove that Napoleonville, Louisiana is still
heaven on Earth—a place where only the good parts of our past are preserved.
There are just some things that will catch more of my attention from now on.
Trayvon All Over Again?
OFFICER SHUT UNARMED MAN 10 TIMES
A few weeks ago, in Charlotte, North Carolina, a 24-year old man Jonathan Ferell got into a car accident on an early Saturday morning. New to the area, he crashed accidentally around 2 in the morning. He pulled himself out of the back of his car, and walked a half of a mile to the nearest house to get help. He began "banging on the door viciously", it now being around 2:30 a.m. The woman answered the door, saw him, quickly shut the door and called the police. The man did not threaten her. The man was not carrying a weapon. When police arrived on the scene later, they found him walking the other direction and tased him. When he did not go down, the officer shot him. 10 times. (Actually, they fired 12 shots, but only 10 made their mark.)
The Police Department quickly arrested the officer who shot the man on charges of voluntary manslaughter. He will face trial soon.
The problem that I have with this situation is not the same issue that so many have taken up with the Trayvon case and the verdict against Zimmerman. While the officer obviously should not have shot the man-he was unarmed, and had not threatened anyone or attempted anything, there seems to be much more of a general consensus around this case that the officer was the one in the wrong. Not the young man seeking help. My problem with this is that it happened in the first place. Obviously, there is a blanket, "Racism is wrong" statement to be made. But it goes beyond that. There are so many other factors that make this even worse. The man had just been in a serious car accident, and was most likely injured. Did the officers not notice that? Additionally, at this point it has been close to an hour since the man was in the car accident, and left his car. Are we supposed to believe that no one had passed the car in over an hour, in a populous place like Charlotte, and that the police weren't aware that their was someone missing from the scene of an accident? To reiterate other points, he also, was not armed, and the officers should have been able to tell that. Finally, he was asking for help. With all of these points combined, it makes it clear that this was entirely an issue of race.
What do you guys think about this? Do you think this could gain national attention? Will people care less because the victim is older?
A few weeks ago, in Charlotte, North Carolina, a 24-year old man Jonathan Ferell got into a car accident on an early Saturday morning. New to the area, he crashed accidentally around 2 in the morning. He pulled himself out of the back of his car, and walked a half of a mile to the nearest house to get help. He began "banging on the door viciously", it now being around 2:30 a.m. The woman answered the door, saw him, quickly shut the door and called the police. The man did not threaten her. The man was not carrying a weapon. When police arrived on the scene later, they found him walking the other direction and tased him. When he did not go down, the officer shot him. 10 times. (Actually, they fired 12 shots, but only 10 made their mark.)
The Police Department quickly arrested the officer who shot the man on charges of voluntary manslaughter. He will face trial soon.
The problem that I have with this situation is not the same issue that so many have taken up with the Trayvon case and the verdict against Zimmerman. While the officer obviously should not have shot the man-he was unarmed, and had not threatened anyone or attempted anything, there seems to be much more of a general consensus around this case that the officer was the one in the wrong. Not the young man seeking help. My problem with this is that it happened in the first place. Obviously, there is a blanket, "Racism is wrong" statement to be made. But it goes beyond that. There are so many other factors that make this even worse. The man had just been in a serious car accident, and was most likely injured. Did the officers not notice that? Additionally, at this point it has been close to an hour since the man was in the car accident, and left his car. Are we supposed to believe that no one had passed the car in over an hour, in a populous place like Charlotte, and that the police weren't aware that their was someone missing from the scene of an accident? To reiterate other points, he also, was not armed, and the officers should have been able to tell that. Finally, he was asking for help. With all of these points combined, it makes it clear that this was entirely an issue of race.
What do you guys think about this? Do you think this could gain national attention? Will people care less because the victim is older?
"How Racism Caused the Shutdown"
This article: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/10/09/2730651/how-racism-caused-the-shutdown/ was published two days ago on ThinkProgress, a liberal political news outlet. The article argues that the reason the government shut down is because of polarization of the two political parties-because of racism-which led to the reaction of the Tea Party.
Essentially, the article says that the racism of Southern Democrats during the Civil Rights Movement is the reason the government is shut down right now. To me this argument seems a little far-fetched, even with the rationale provided. The authors argument begins pre-Civil Rights Movement with Democrats in the South advocating for anti-black policies and Northern Democrats focusing more on New Deal deals. Because of the disagreement within the party, Northern Democrats began to vote more like their Republican counterparts in the North. The parties became regionally divided when Southern whites began migrating from the Democratic party when they realized they could no longer achieve their white supremacy goals within the party. Long story short, we have the heavily Southern Republican party of today. As the party becomes more and more conservative, the Tea Party spins off. Led by Ted Cruz, we have the government shut down.
Additionally, the author states that the reason we have the government shutdown because we have a black president. So, a culmination of the fact that a new party was built because people couldn't give up their racist agenda, coupled with the fact that we have a black president-apparently a government shutdown was just BOUND TO HAPPEN.
In response, I believe there are a few things that the author needs to be reminded of. 1) This is not the first time that the government has shut down, but this is our first black president. So obviously this doesn't have an impact. (Additionally, the last time it shut down was also over Healthcare, with a Democratic president in office. Clinton & Gingrich) 2) To say that the sole cause of a huge, complicated governmental issue is race, introduces race where it doesn't need to be. It is often said that issues all become about race once it is brought up in even the slightest aspect. Do you think mentioning race tints issues that otherwise don't need to be? Additionally, do you buy the authors argument? Do you think racism caused the shutdown?
Essentially, the article says that the racism of Southern Democrats during the Civil Rights Movement is the reason the government is shut down right now. To me this argument seems a little far-fetched, even with the rationale provided. The authors argument begins pre-Civil Rights Movement with Democrats in the South advocating for anti-black policies and Northern Democrats focusing more on New Deal deals. Because of the disagreement within the party, Northern Democrats began to vote more like their Republican counterparts in the North. The parties became regionally divided when Southern whites began migrating from the Democratic party when they realized they could no longer achieve their white supremacy goals within the party. Long story short, we have the heavily Southern Republican party of today. As the party becomes more and more conservative, the Tea Party spins off. Led by Ted Cruz, we have the government shut down.
Additionally, the author states that the reason we have the government shutdown because we have a black president. So, a culmination of the fact that a new party was built because people couldn't give up their racist agenda, coupled with the fact that we have a black president-apparently a government shutdown was just BOUND TO HAPPEN.
In response, I believe there are a few things that the author needs to be reminded of. 1) This is not the first time that the government has shut down, but this is our first black president. So obviously this doesn't have an impact. (Additionally, the last time it shut down was also over Healthcare, with a Democratic president in office. Clinton & Gingrich) 2) To say that the sole cause of a huge, complicated governmental issue is race, introduces race where it doesn't need to be. It is often said that issues all become about race once it is brought up in even the slightest aspect. Do you think mentioning race tints issues that otherwise don't need to be? Additionally, do you buy the authors argument? Do you think racism caused the shutdown?
Let's See How Far We've Come
(No, I am not
referring to a Matchbox 20 song, apologies if that is what you are now
singing.)
In thinking of
where I'll be in 12hours, and as an Urban Studies student that will spend the
weekend between the Lower Ninth Ward and St. Bernard's Parish, I've been
thinking of how New Orleans reacted after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
There is a clip
from Tim Wise on white privilege and its mechanism of ‘divide and conquer.’ The
part I find the most relevant to my topic is the part in which he discusses the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in St. Bernard Parish, in which the local
working class whites failed to recognize they had more in common with the local
working class blacks than they did with the white politicians who failed to
protect their interest.
I'm sure some of
you may have already viewed this in one class or another but here is the clip:
(the whole clip is great but feel free to fast-forward to 6:05):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Xe1kX7Wsc
The fact that the
Parrish Council meeting passed an ordinance saying that you can't rent property
in St. Bernard to anyone who wasn't a blood relative was too much for me to
understand at the time. I simply could not wrap my mind around this ordinance.
Yes, there were repercussions afterwards. More cases have been opened in
response, but we are still bringing up similar discussion of race relations in
the United States. Many have written posts on the response of the Treyvon
Martin, which as we all know received not only national coverage but also sparked
interest of other countries. So what happens to the local ordinances, laws, and
everyday interactions? It’s clear that race relations in the US are not improving,
but we get such limited exposure, how are we to measure where we are today?
Here is the
Matchbox 20 video just in case you actually want to hear the song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9vOwc-6t-8
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)